The ProblemHow It WorksDemosPolicyRegulatoryStandardsBriefingsAboutContact
Standards & Technical Alignment

Built to Federal Standards.
Aligned to What’s Coming.

GRACE’s architecture is designed around current NIST standards and the emerging federal framework for agentic AI governance — not retrofitted to meet them after the fact.

Federal standards for AI governance in regulated environments are evolving rapidly. GRACE was engineered to move with that evolution — grounded in existing authoritative frameworks while designed to accommodate the agentic AI-specific standards now being developed at the national level.

Every standard referenced below is named correctly and verified as of June 2026. GRACE does not claim alignment with standards it has not implemented.

NIST AI Risk Management Framework · AI RMF 1.0 · Published January 2023
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

The NIST AI RMF establishes a voluntary framework for managing risks throughout the AI lifecycle, covering governance, mapping, measurement, and management of AI risk across four core functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, and MANAGE.

GRACE’s enforcement kernel operationalizes the AI RMF’s core functions at the system level, embedding risk controls directly into the agentic AI execution pipeline rather than treating compliance as a documentation exercise performed after deployment. Pre-execution validation (GOVERN / MANAGE), state capture via SHADOW (MEASURE), and cryptographically sealed Policy Action Packets (GOVERN) are all direct expressions of the RMF architecture, implemented at runtime.

✓ Currently Operative
NIST CAISI · AI Agent Standards Initiative · Launched January 2026
NIST AI Agent Standards Initiative

In January 2026, NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) launched the AI Agent Standards Initiative and issued a Request for Information on secure development and deployment of agentic systems — directly addressing the category of AI that GRACE governs.

GRACE’s architecture directly addresses the core concerns this initiative is designed to standardize: pre-execution intent validation, behavioral boundary enforcement, identity and authorization controls for autonomous agents, and auditable execution records at the individual action level. GRACE is positioned to align with formal NIST agentic AI standards as they are finalized, and the architecture was designed from the outset to accommodate that alignment without requiring material changes to the enforcement kernel.

● Emerging — GRACE Positioned
NIST FIPS 204 · ML-DSA-65 · Finalized August 2024
FIPS 204 / ML-DSA-65 — Post-Quantum Cryptographic Signing

GRACE uses ML-DSA-65, standardized under FIPS 204, for cryptographic signing of all execution logs. This post-quantum digital signature standard — finalized by NIST in August 2024 — ensures that GRACE’s audit trail remains cryptographically verifiable against adversaries operating with quantum computing capability.

Every Policy Action Packet produced by GRACE is signed with ML-DSA-65 at the moment of the enforcement decision. The signature is tamper-evident: any modification to the record after sealing invalidates the signature and is immediately detectable. The institution owns these records. The vendor does not.

For financial institutions subject to heightened national security cybersecurity scrutiny, post-quantum signing is not a future consideration. It is a present requirement that GRACE already meets.

✓ Currently Implemented
Federal Reserve / OCC · SR 11-7 / OCC 2011-12 · Published 2011 · Still Operative
SR 11-7 / OCC Model Risk Management Guidance

Interagency supervisory guidance on model risk management (SR 11-7 / OCC 2011-12) remains the operative standard for how regulated financial institutions govern AI and algorithmic systems. Published in 2011, it has not been formally superseded for traditional model categories despite fifteen years of AI evolution.

SR 26-2, issued jointly by the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC in April 2026, supersedes SR 11-7 for many model categories — but explicitly excludes generative and agentic AI from its scope in Footnote 3. The result is that the most consequential category of AI now operating inside regulated financial institutions exists outside the coverage of both the original guidance and its successor.

GRACE’s MRM continuity layer addresses this directly. It extends SR 11-7 and SR 26-2 model risk obligations to cover agentic systems, providing the validation documentation, performance monitoring architecture, and examiner-ready audit records that supervisory expectations require — for the category of AI that no existing guidance was written to reach.

✓ MRM Continuity Layer Implemented
Bipartisan Senate AI Working Group · AI Policy Roadmap · Published May 2024
Senate AI Policy Roadmap — Financial Sector Gap Analysis Directive

The bipartisan Senate AI Policy Roadmap, produced by the Senate AI Working Group in May 2024, directed relevant committees to conduct a regulatory gap analysis in the financial sector and develop legislation ensuring financial service providers govern AI properly.

GRACE’s development was informed by the same gap the Roadmap identified — the absence of enforcement-layer infrastructure for agentic AI in regulated environments. GRACE is the practical answer to the gap that bipartisan Senate direction called for addressing: a pre-execution enforcement architecture that operates within existing regulatory frameworks, produces examiner-ready documentation, and does not require new legislation to deploy.

✓ Directly Addresses Identified Gap

Request technical documentation.

Architecture overview, FIPS 204 implementation details, and examination scenario materials available upon request.

Schedule a Technical Briefing Request Documentation

See the enforcement kernel in practice.

Live demonstrations of GRACE operating across financial enforcement scenarios — staffed, scheduled, and tailored to your institution.